3-way battle

[Guest sirmethos]

Max Payne(movie version) and Captain Leo Davidson(from Planet of the apes)

 

vs.

 

Punisher(thomas jane version) and Maj. 'Mitch' Hunter(Mutant Chronicles, movie version)

 

vs.

 

Rorshach(movie version) and Guerrero(Human Target).

 

 

Round 1: Hand to hand combat(close-combat weapons allowed)

 

Round 2: anything goes.

 

For both rounds, the three teams start 1 city block away from each other.

 

Who wins?

 

Inspired by Nova's comment

Mark Wahlberg vs Thomas Jane vs Jackie Haley....interesting.

[Guest bigballerju]

Great fight. I'm glad you used Human Target as that was a great show and his character was good.

 

Round One goes to Team Guerrero as there superior to the other teams in my opinion. I think Guerrero and Rorshach showed better H2H combat.

 

Round Two goes to team Punisher. Anything allowed means weapons and the other teams won't defeat Punisher's team in a battle where all weapons can be used. Thomas Jane's Punisher used heavy weapons and explosives like comics Punisher. Plus he showed to be just as smart. The same can be said for Mitch's character who is good with weapons.

[C.T.]

Heh wow.

[Guest bigballerju]

LOL what did I do now?

[C.T.]

Nothing. Was saying that because I didn't expect to inspire this with that comment.

[Guest Redemption X]

I really can't support the use of "Captain Leo Davidson" over George Taylor (AKA Charlton Heston, one of the first badasses of the silver screen).

 

Damn Generation Z kids, don't know any movies before 1996.

[Guest Hayesmeister5651]

Punisher FTW.

[Guest sirmethos]

I really can't support the use of "Captain Leo Davidson" over George Taylor (AKA Charlton Heston, one of the first badasses of the silver screen).

 

Damn Generation Z kids, don't know any movies before 1996.

 

Inspired by Nova's comment

Mark Wahlberg vs Thomas Jane vs Jackie Haley....interesting.

 

Try actually reading. Maybe with a dictionary in hand if there are words you have trouble understanding. It would make you seem a bit less like an ignorant idiot.

[Guest Redemption X]

Do you always have to point out my mistakes in the same smug, condescending fashion? Would it kill you to be polite for once?

[Guest bigballerju]

I have to agree Methos that was a little bit uncalled for. I think he might have been joking around too.

[Guest sirmethos]

Do you always have to point out my mistakes in the same smug, condescending fashion? Would it kill you to be polite for once?

 

Once you stop acting like an idiot, time and time again, waving your ignorance around like a friggin' flag. Then I'll start being polite.

 

I'm relatively polite most of the time, but idiocy and ignorance annoys me, especially repeat performances.

 

If needs be, I'll make a quote gallery to show you, and everyone else, exactly what I'm talking about.

 

To repeat what I've told a ton of people: "If you don't like being treated like an idiot, then don't act like one. It's really not that difficult."

 

 

I have to agree Methos that was a little bit uncalled for. I think he might have been joking around too.

 

As often as he proves himself to be as ignorant as I'm calling him, no, that was definitely not uncalled for.

 

The first 10, 20, maybe 50 times, I was relatively nice in pointing out his mistakes. That obviously didn't work. Now, I'm going to bash him over the head with it until it works.

 

Again: "If you don't like being treated like an idiot, then don't act like one. It's really not that difficult."

 

As for joking around:

1. Smiley's and various emoticons exist for the purpose of indicating things like that. There was nothing in his post to indicate that he was joking.

2. His post voiced exactly the same opinions and idiocy that a large part of his other posts have shown, thus indicating that he was being serious.

[Guest Benjamin Grimm]

Mark Wahlberg on drugs will win.