Jump to content
By UMPIRE

Sindacco Crime Family vs. Forelli Crime Family

MATCH SCORE
Sindacco Crime Family: 0
Forelli Crime Family: 1

By UMPIRE

Siegfried vs. Kazuya Mishima

MATCH SCORE
Siegfried: 1
Kazuya Mishima: 7

By UMPIRE

Maulkiller vs. Dante (DMC)

MATCH SCORE
Maulkiller: 4
Dante (DMC): 0

By UMPIRE

Rugal Bernstein vs. Raidou

MATCH SCORE
Rugal Bernstein: 4
Raidou: 1

By UMPIRE

Fox (Gargoyles) vs. Fox (Wanted)

MATCH SCORE
Fox (Gargoyles): 4
Fox (Wanted): 1

By UMPIRE

Scarlet Witch vs. Cybermen (Mondasian)

MATCH SCORE
Scarlet Witch: 5
Cybermen (Mondasian): 0

By UMPIRE

Momiji vs. Sophitia Alexandra

MATCH SCORE
Momiji: 2
Sophitia Alexandra: 8

By UMPIRE

Ken Masters vs. Ash Crimson

MATCH SCORE
Ken Masters: 9
Ash Crimson: 1

By UMPIRE

Vin vs. Korra

MATCH SCORE
Vin: 4
Korra: 3

By UMPIRE

Snow White vs. Danny The Dog

MATCH SCORE
Snow White: 3
Danny The Dog: 1

By UMPIRE

Sweet vs. The Music Meister

MATCH SCORE
Sweet: 3
The Music Meister: 0

By UMPIRE

Ibuki vs. Mai Shiranui

MATCH SCORE
Ibuki: 6
Mai Shiranui: 5

By UMPIRE

The Klingon Empire vs. The Demon Sorcerers

MATCH SCORE
The Klingon Empire: 0
The Demon Sorcerers: 4

By UMPIRE

Crimson Viper vs. Ayane

MATCH SCORE
Crimson Viper: 0
Ayane: 9

By UMPIRE

The Lord Of The Dance vs. Michael Jackson (Moonwalker)

MATCH SCORE
The Lord Of The Dance: 1
Michael Jackson (Moonwalker): 3

By UMPIRE

Minute Men (Kaiserreich) vs. Mishima Zaibatsu

MATCH SCORE
Minute Men (Kaiserreich): 0
Mishima Zaibatsu: 3

By UMPIRE

Ryu Hayabusa vs. Jin Kazama

MATCH SCORE
Ryu Hayabusa: 4
Jin Kazama: 2

By UMPIRE

Siegfried vs. General M. Bison

MATCH SCORE
Siegfried: 3
General M. Bison: 2

By UMPIRE

Emma Peel vs. Baroness

MATCH SCORE
Emma Peel: 4
Baroness: 2

By UMPIRE

Sophitia Alexandra vs. Rachel (Ninja Gaiden)

MATCH SCORE
Sophitia Alexandra: 3
Rachel (Ninja Gaiden): 2

Match 11999 Calvin vs. Hobbes


Peypeypeypey
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest LoneWolf

I think the Hate Judge might not realize that the 'B' grade he gave is only equivalent to an 'It's OK' using the old system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest sirmethos

It doesn't matter what the equivalent in the old system would be, we're not using the old system anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Possible. But take a look at this match. Scratched with 2 Ds and a C. It may not be a fantastic set-up, but my first match (which consisted of this:

It would be a good old fashioned shootout with neither opponent giving an inch. But Wolfwood would lose because that huge gun would slow him down.

) received a 1.5. .2 higher than a guy's first one.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LoneWolf

Wow that 1.3 was harsh for that match, which wasn't bad at all. For some reason, I can't currently grade matches either, I was kind of doing a fair share of grading as well.

 

I had a thread about this a few months back where I gave examples of specific set-ups and what I thought was a fair rating.

 

I'm sure someone is going to jump in with "well, not everyone agrees with you!" Still, if someone put enough effort to write 5 or so paragraphs with out any major spelling errors, cursing, offensive content and genuinely tried to make a decent match, that match should rate a 'B' at least. C for 1-2 paragraphs or a lot of errors, ....

 

D's and F's are for people who put NO effort into their set-up. Or simply wrote a childish mess of swearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest D-Funk'd

If this, um, "Hate Bad" judge is one of the people I think it might be, it's gonna be virtually impossible to get a good grade out of him/her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter what the equivalent in the old system would be, we're not using the old system anymore.

First post was in response to Lonewolf. How is it any different from the old system? The highest grade still gives a 4. The next grade gives a 3. The only difference between this new system and the old one, is we have that in between option, for just passable set-ups, in the C grade. And for some reason, an even lower rating than a 1, in the F.

 

I think some of the judges may not be aware of what score they're giving with every grade, or we wouldn't be seeing decent set-ups getting scratched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this, um, "Hate Bad" judge is one of the people I think it might be, it's gonna be virtually impossible to get a good grade out of him/her.

Skillz? Also, as I asked in the Judge section, wasn't Lonewolf a judge? Who removed him?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LoneWolf

Skillz? Also, as I asked in the Judge section, wasn't Lonewolf a judge? Who removed him?

I *really* doubt the hate judge is DSkills.

 

As for my status, I think it was revoked accidentally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest force_echo

Wow that 1.3 was harsh for that match, which wasn't bad at all. For some reason, I can't currently grade matches either, I was kind of doing a fair share of grading as well.

 

I had a thread about this a few months back where I gave examples of specific set-ups and what I thought was a fair rating.

 

I'm sure someone is going to jump in with "well, not everyone agrees with you!" Still, if someone put enough effort to write 5 or so paragraphs with out any major spelling errors, cursing, offensive content and genuinely tried to make a decent match, that match should rate a 'B' at least. C for 1-2 paragraphs or a lot of errors, ....

 

D's and F's are for people who put NO effort into their set-up. Or simply wrote a childish mess of swearing.

Yeah, that's your opinion. A lot of people, myself included, might think your method of grading is retarded. I personally don't give a damn about cursing or offensive content or effort or length.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I *really* doubt the hate judge is DSkills.

 

As for my status, I think it was revoked accidentally.

Lol. No. I meant was I talking to DSkillz. I don't think he's the one giving out negative grades.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest LoneWolf

Yeah, that's your opinion. A lot of people, myself included, might think your method of grading is retarded. I personally don't give a damn about cursing or offensive content or effort or length.

Alright....so the natural question to ask is do you actually have a criteria for grading? Or is it completely random?

 

I didn't think anything I stated was 'retarded', it seemed very logical and reasonable actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest force_echo

When I do grade, I grade purely based on if I liked it or not. I don't care if it's 2 sentences or 2 pages, if I like it, I give it a good grade. I don't care if the person put all the effort in the world in it, if I don't like it, I give it a bad grade. I also don't care about offensive subject matter or swearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this, um, "Hate Bad" judge is one of the people I think it might be, it's gonna be virtually impossible to get a good grade out of him/her.

Wait a minute... Could that be a clue?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...