Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Having an idea for a new thread of matches over on here. People pick a team of characters and then they're put in one on one matches or sceanrios. The catch is that the characters are teh lowest, most pathetic, useless LOSERS in fiction. And most fights the arguments are over which of them in a matchup would LOSE said battle. Just to turn arguing over on its head for a cahnge, and see who can coem up with the most useless chars in existence, match them up over against others of tehir ilk, and then make a convincing case taht theirs is more pathetic than the rest! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Artemis Entreri Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Okay I got one: Mr Glass (unbreakable) Vs. The scarecrow (Wizard of Oz) No prep just straight up fist fight! Who Wins! Or Loses......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 That's.. Hard, Artemis, since Scarecrow is actually fairly intelligent, fast, and in the books goes on to become King of Oz and is a very competent negotiator, statesman, and diplomat in a land where Oz is ruled by 'Bread and Circuses' to put it aptly. Having read some of the jokes, the 'Army' of Oz is.. well, even more laughable than unarmed Starfleet Redshirts up against Demonic trolls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Artemis Entreri Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 That's.. Hard, Artemis, since Scarecrow is actually fairly intelligent, fast, and in the books goes on to become King of Oz and is a very competent negotiator, statesman, and diplomat in a land where Oz is ruled by 'Bread and Circuses' to put it aptly. Having read some of the jokes, the 'Army' of Oz is.. well, even more laughable than unarmed Starfleet Redshirts up against Demonic trolls. Still this is a fist fight! Both physically suck! Who wins? LOL I won't make this easy for you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Diskyr Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Kick-Ass and Toymaker Thats a fight I would love to see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Kick-Ass and Toymaker Thats a fight I would love to see Toymaker was a threat to Elmer Fudd with Superman's powers. In canon. Something that awesomely WTF needs acnkolwedged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Having an idea for a new thread of matches over on here. People pick a team of characters and then they're put in one on one matches or sceanrios. The catch is that the characters are teh lowest, most pathetic, useless LOSERS in fiction. And most fights the arguments are over which of them in a matchup would LOSE said battle. Just to turn arguing over on its head for a cahnge, and see who can coem up with the most useless chars in existence, match them up over against others of tehir ilk, and then make a convincing case taht theirs is more pathetic than the rest! Okay... Jar Jar Binks vs Deadeye Duncan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Binks takes down killer robots. Say whaty ou want about the fact he's slapstick, he is both INCREDIBLY loyal to his friends and incredibly courageous to boot. The 'man' is regarded as the laughingstock of the Senate, and yet is personally loyal to the Republic to the point he faces up to all of his hideous public speaking fears to make a presentation to the Senate for teh Emergency Powers Act and does it with APLOMB. He led Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan to the Gungans secret home despite the fact that they said if he ever returned there he would be executed.. TWICE. He then led an army into battle and charged Battle Droids when he had NO WEAPONS to try and save his fellow Gungans from being killed. Yes, he's ludicrous and a slapstick character. But his loyalty and bravery are UNQUESTIONABLE. He's the four foot ten nerd on an inhaler that goes out with you when you're drunk off your ass to be your designated driver and watches you pick a fightw ith the biggest, burliest Hell's Angel in the place and then backs you up in it and tries to save you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Binks takes down killer robots. Say whaty ou want about the fact he's slapstick, he is both INCREDIBLY loyal to his friends and incredibly courageous to boot. The 'man' is regarded as the laughingstock of the Senate, and yet is personally loyal to the Republic to the point he faces up to all of his hideous public speaking fears to make a presentation to the Senate for teh Emergency Powers Act and does it with APLOMB. He led Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan to the Gungans secret home despite the fact that they said if he ever returned there he would be executed.. TWICE. He then led an army into battle and charged Battle Droids when he had NO WEAPONS to try and save his fellow Gungans from being killed. Yes, he's ludicrous and a slapstick character. But his loyalty and bravery are UNQUESTIONABLE. He's the four foot ten nerd on an inhaler that goes out with you when you're drunk off your ass to be your designated driver and watches you pick a fightw ith the biggest, burliest Hell's Angel in the place and then backs you up in it and tries to save you. Yes, he's brave and loyal...to the point of stupidity as shown in all that you provided. Face it...risk certain death at the hands of his people for two Jedi who thought he was useless? Went into a battle with no weapons? Gets into a fight with the biggest, burliest Angel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 That's called "BadAss Normal" by TV Tropes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Yes, he's brave and loyal...to the point of stupidity as shown in all that you provided. Face it...risk certain death at the hands of his people for two Jedi who thought he was useless? Went into a battle with no weapons? Gets into a fight with the biggest, burliest Angel? Also, I believe that you asked for the most pathetic losers. I don't think loyalty and bravery changes that, but I agree he's brave and loyal and maybe a little idiotic... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Well,the idea is for who we think would lose in a fight. And Jar-Jar is too (stupid) to run away and has a low level ability to win via dumb lumb or take out his oppoennt by accident. So, he might have a chacne of winning in a fight against someone even more useless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Cosmic Deadpool Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Kick-Ass and Toymaker Thats a fight I would love to seeJessie and James (Team Rocket) vs Fabian Stankowicz Jesse and James, the most incompetent corporate stooges..evah... "They're blasting off agaaaaaaaain!" and Fabian "Mechano-Marauder" Stankowicz .. Upon his third encounter against the Avengers..he was defeated by David Letterman who hit him in the head with a giant doorknob.. Who wins..err..loses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Adam Safran Posted June 9, 2009 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Jessie and James have shown themselevs to be competent when doing evil v evil matchups, or doing something altruistic/not related to Pikachu. If they're standing up for good karma or against someone eevn worse, they tend to do pretty well. And their Pokemons hould have pretty decent stats, given how much they've fought them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest LegendX Posted June 10, 2009 Share Posted June 10, 2009 How about C-3PO vs Eeyore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C.T. Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Well,the idea is for who we think would lose in a fight. And Jar-Jar is too (stupid) to run away and has a low level ability to win via dumb lumb or take out his oppoennt by accident. So, he might have a chacne of winning in a fight against someone even more useless. oh then deadeye duncan vs battle droidsAlso does Jar Jar's luck indicate force sensitivity? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
videogameman Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Glass Joe vs Dan Hibiki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest boston_celtics Posted June 16, 2009 Share Posted June 16, 2009 Jobberseid vs. Thanos w/ Omnipotence and his "I am Unworthy" complex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now